Monday, November 29, 2010
Use CURF!!!
The research directory on CURF's website can help you search for proffesors who are looking for volunteers, independent research projects and work study students.
Another important way that CURF can help you get started in research is, of course, funding. Although faculty may already have grant money to conduct research, if you're starting your own project or traveling this summer you may need to get funding of your own. Here is a list of the grants that CURF offers. If you're still confused or just want help finding out which grants are appropriate for you, don't hesitate to sign up for a research consultation at CURF.
Good luck!
Monday, November 22, 2010
BBB Movie Night - Tues. November 30th, 7pm
The BBB Society's Annual Movie night will be held on Tuesday, November 30th at 7pm in Meyerson Hall B2. Psychology professor Dr. Alan Stocker will kick off the night with a short talk on human perception of illusions and magic. Then we'll be showing the 2006 hit thriller The Prestige starring Christian Bale and Hugh Jackman. Free food (popcorn!) and drinks will be provided.
Sunday, November 21, 2010
The Benefits of Butter
Thursday, November 18, 2010
Sing Me A Memory
You can often recognize it on the very first beat. The melody starts to consume you, as you feel a rush from head to toe…and all of the sudden you begin to sing, uncontrollably, whether in the shower, the car, or sometimes even in public! There is no better feeling when you catch a familiar tune that was a classic "back in the day", or even a song that used to be your favorite, especially if it has been a while since you’ve heard it. I’m the first to admit that I would sometimes take the long way to drive home if a song came on the car radio that I wanted to listen to in its entirety, and I’ve never been embarrassed by my shower voice.
I’ve always found it fascinating how songs have the ability to change our moods, and so I was intrigued when I heard that songs have been found to possess memory-evoking capabilities. Throughout our lives, many songs tend to be affiliated with a period of particularly strong emotion, from couples recollecting a song playing when they first met, to a student remembering a song from his senior year in high school. It is no surprise that music is strongly tied to memory, since memories are more easily recalled during periods of intense emotional experience. "What seems to happen is that a piece of familiar music serves as a soundtrack for a mental movie that starts playing in our heads," said Petr Janata, a cognitive neuroscientist at University of California, Davis.
Jamata recognized that the medial pre-frontal cortex actually tracks chord and key changes in music, an area of the brain that is also activated in response to self-reflection and autobiographical recall. So, when an autobiographically related song was played to subjects in Jamata’s study, it is no surprise that this brain region was activated.
Even more interesting is the potential for music in areas such as Alzheimer’s research. These are individuals who suffer significant amounts of memory loss, but are still able to recognize songs from their pasts. "What's striking is that the prefrontal cortex is among the last [brain regions] to atrophy," Janata noted. Even if these patients cannot recall the memory that the song was affiliated with, the emotion associated with that experience is still evoked, evidenced by Alzheimer’s patients often singing along and reporting feelings of happiness when listening songs familiar to them. This just goes to show that when all else has left our minds, music will still be with us. Perhaps one day, this may lead to a method of retrieval of those memories we once thought permanently inaccessible, or lost forever, by the degenerative disease.
Also refer to the book by world-famous neurologist Oliver Sacks, Musicophilia
Tuesday, November 16, 2010
See Inside a Cell
Monday, November 15, 2010
Brainstorm Staff Meeting
Have you enjoyed reading Brainstorm? Would you like to become invloved or write for the blog? Do you have ideas for improving Brainstorm?
Come to the Brainstorm staff meeting Tomorrow, Tuesday, Nov 16th at 8:00 in JMHH F86.
aaand on a completely unrelated note, check out this interview with Jane Goodall in the New York Times. She's just the coolest person ever.
Sunday, November 14, 2010
Nama-say whaaa?
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
Robbed by the One – Armed Bandit
Over the course of evolution, our brains have adapted to try and predict the outcomes of certain events. We make predictions, compare them to what actually happens, and then learn from error and adjust. When we make correct predictions, our body possesses a mechanism to ensure that we continue to do so: the reward areas of our brain. The brain’s reward circuitry releases the neurotransmitter dopamine, the chemical responsible for the pleasures we feel from sex, drugs, alcohol, music, chocolate, love, and even gambling. If we receive a positive outcome as a result of our actions (reinforcement), then we will repeat our behaviors.
The more “off-target” that our predictions are, the faster we will learn because as a species, we don’t like to be wrong. In fact, human beings do not like being wrong so much, that the fear of losing can be considered even greater than the pleasures of winning. Loss-aversion is a key factor that drives our everyday decisions; we are much more willing to settle for a lesser, guaranteed reward, than a reward of greater magnitude for which there is a risk of losing. So it is within the boundaries of human nature to avoid losses at all costs…with the exception of one circumstance: the “near-miss”.
What is a “near miss”? Imagine yourself in front of a slot machine, pulling the arm, as you’re watching the colors of each of the characters whiz by in a blur. Bing...Bing...Bing. You’ve managed to match two pictures in a row, but the third one is just one away from the desired spot, and now you’re itching to try for it again. That is a “near miss”. “Near misses” are extremely addictive, because they raise activity in the exact same reward circuitry of the brain as wins do (perhaps suggesting that if the behavior continues, a win is soon to follow). Wins activate reward pathways in the midbrain, as well as losses that could be considered a “near-misses”. People will continue to return to the slots after a near miss due to a sense of reward, leading to addictive behavior. For problem gamblers, the activation of these specific brain areas is even more enhanced than in casual gamblers.
Our evolutionary flaw is that, while the brain is efficient in most circumstances, it will try desperately to fit occurrences of “random chance” into a predictable model, striving to figure out explanations for what there is simply no explanation for. Unfortunately, this makes our brains fully capable of misinterpreting information, and so we may be fooled into making a decision that is not logically sound, overwhelmed by a rush of emotion from dopamine.
“Although near-misses while playing a slot machine felt less pleasant than wins, they increased the desire to play just as much as long as players felt they had some control over their spins—supporting the idea that the illusion of skill underlies the phenomenon,” says Luke Clark of the University of Cambridge. People who play the lottery or stock machines often confuse phenomena resulting from pure chance (wins/losses) with those that are caused by personal skill and ability. The key here is that the gambler believes that he is at least partially in charge: that some type of his personal skill is involved. This convinces gamblers to try their luck, even after several consecutive “near-misses”.
Think about it. This is essentially the power to convince someone, at least at the neurological level, that they have won without actually letting them win…a dangerous idea, but a reality that has not gone unnoticed by business. Businesses (particularly casinos) and slot-machine makers actually use virtual reels to create a high number of “near-misses”. While your neurons desperately attempt to decode the “logic of luck”, you keep emptying your bucket, feeding the one-armed bandit more quarters...business is booming.
It is common belief that emotions derail us from logic, inhibiting us from our ability to reason. Yet, without emotion we would be indecisive, forced to analyze every possible option. Emotions may provide us with the impetus to make our decisions, but when our emotions are out of control, perhaps we are just as good without them.
To read more click this link:
http://www.newsweek.com/2010/05/11/hit-me-again-the-gambling-brain.html
Monday, November 8, 2010
Brain Music
Sunday, November 7, 2010
Can't Read My P-p-p-poker Face
Thursday, November 4, 2010
Glia!
Tuesday, November 2, 2010
The Prestige- Movie Night
Visual illusions can provide great insights into how our brains work and process information. With that in mind, I like to announce the BBB Society's Annual Movie Night: The Prestige on Tuesday, November 30th. The night will begin with an explanation of visual illusions by Psychology professor Dr. Alan Stocker, followed by some demonstrations from the film's magicians. More information to come (date/time/location/etc.) but you should all get excited for a great night!
Monday, November 1, 2010
Tpyos: How the Barin is Arwae of its Mstiaeks
The typo: every perfectionist’s worst nightmare as he looks over his paper, just minutes before handing it in. It may be true that word processing programs keep developing more advanced spell check and auto correct features, but even the best computer can miss some mistakes we make while typing. In addition, while quickly reading over our words, we are prone to not catching some of the spelling errors. It turns out that the master detectors of all keyboard related errors are our very fingers themselves.
Experimenters tested subjects (skilled typists, who could type 40 words per minute with about 90% accuracy, and used all of their fingers while typing) by creating a word processor that would secretly fix a typist’s real spelling errors, and also create new errors in words initially typed correctly. Subjects took both the blame for the errors that were not truly theirs, and the credit for the researcher’s corrections. Despite what was actually typed, the subjects believed that the words they intended to type were actually displayed on the screen, indicating inaccuracy in their conscious analyses of their individual performances.
These results may suggest a “hierarchical method of error correction”; the motor system does the work while several cortical areas assign causal characteristics such as blame and credit. Essentially, these two processes are entirely disassociated, so that the hands and fingers can catch errors that the mind cannot. Not convinced? Try typing a paragraph with your eyes closed. Chances are you will know when you make an error, and automatically go back to fix it. It is suggested that typing is just another activity that we do on autopilot without thinking, liken to walking or doing some other familiar task. Perhaps this can be viewed as the brain's way of providing multiple methods of checking for error -- a reliable autopilot, and a proofreading/ error attributing "higher" cortical system. If our conscious places that much confidence in our "autopilot" , perhaps it is safe to assume we can trust the driver.
To read more, click the link: http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/10/fingers-know-typos/
Sidenote: To illustrate how easy it is to miss a typo, take a look at the title above. I bet that you can easily read each word, despite the jumbled letters. This is because the mind doesn’t read every letter individually, but rather groups them together and reads the word as a whole (the only necessity is that the first and last letters are in the right place). Now imagine trying to catch a typo when reading quickly under time induced stress... not likely.